Ecosystem Biomimicry: A way to achieve thermal comfort in architecture

Abaeian, H.; Madani, R.; Bahramian, A.

doi:10.22034/ijhcum.2016.04.004

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

Department of Architecture, University of Isfahan Art, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijhcum.2016.04.004

Abstract

The strategies to reduce the consumption of non-renewable energies in buildings are becoming increasingly important. In the meantime, nature-inspired approaches have emerged as a new strategy to achieve thermal comfort in the interiors. However, the use of these approaches in architecture and buildings requires a proper understanding regarding the features of ecosystems. Although acquiring this knowledge requires a high degree of familiarity with the fields such as biology and environmental science, review of achievements made by the use of these features could facilitate the understanding of ecomimicry processes and thereby contribute to environmental sustainability in buildings. In other words, this paper concerns the relationship between these features and the thermal comfort inside the building. Biomimicry is an approach to innovation that seeks sustainable solutions to human challenges by emulating nature’s time-tested patterns and strategies. The objective of this paper is to use such review to provide an approach to the use of natural features for achieving thermal comfort in the buildings of hot and dry climates. In this review, the successful examples are analyzed to identify and examine the principles that influence the thermal comfort in both building and urban levels. The results show that the three elements of water, wind, sun are the effective natural resources that must be utilized in the design in a way proportional and consistent with the natural features. In addition, functional features of ecosystem can be of value only in the presence of a processual relationship between them.

Highlights

Functional features of ecosystem can be of value only in the presence of a processual relationship between them

Keywords

Biomimicry

Environmental sustainability

Natural ecosystems, Sustainable architecture, Thermal comfort

Main Subjects

Urban architecture, design, development and planning

References

Alcamo, J.; Ash, N.J.; Butler, C.D.; Callicott, J.B.; Capistrano, D.; Carpenter, S.R., (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute, 266. Island Press.

Aries, M.B.C.; Aarts, M.P.J.; Van Hoof, J., (2015). Daylight and health: A review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment. Light. Res. Technol., 47(1): 6-27 (22 pages).

Aye, L.; Fuller, R., (2012). The proposed heating and cooling system in the CH2 building and its impact on occupant productivity. Constr. Econ. Build., 5(2): 32-39 (8 pages).

Bejan, A., (2000). Shape and structure, from engineering to nature. Cambridge university press, Cambridge.

Benyus, J. M., (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature, Harper collins publishers, New York.

BIG, B. I., (2010). Zira island masterplan. Urban Environ. Des., 10.

Bjarke, I., (2009). 3 Warp-Speed Architecture Tales. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/bjarke_ingels_3_warp_speed_architecture_tales

Daily, G.C.; Söderqvist, T.; Aniyar, S., Arrow, K.; Dasgupta, P.; Ehrlich, P.R.; Folke, C.; Jansson, A.; Jansson, B.O.;Kautsky, N. ;Levin, S.; (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Sci., 289(5478): 395-396 (2 pages). DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395

de Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M., (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ., 41(3): 393-408 (16 pages).

Fisk, W.J.; Rosenfeld, A.H., (1997). Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor Air, 7(3):158-172 (15 pages).

Graham, P., (2009). Building ecology: First principles for a sustainable built environment. John Wiley and Sons.

Koch-Nielsen, H., (2013). Stay cool: a design guide for the built environment in hot climates. Routledge.

Pearce, M., (2014). Eastgate development Harare. Available at: http://www.mickpearce.com/works/office-public-buildings/eastgate-development-harare/ (Accessed 24 April 2014).

Meinhold, B., (2009). Qatar Sprouts a Towering Cactus Skyscraper, Inhabitat, Available at: http://inhabitat.com/qatar-cactus-office-building/ (Accessed 17 March 2009).

International Energy Agency (IEA), (2012). Energy technology perspectives 2012: pathways to a clean energy system. OECD/IEA.

Kellert, S.R.; Heerwagen, J.; Mador, M., (2011). Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley and Sons.

Kibert, C; Sendzimir, J; Guy, G. B., (2003). Construction ecology: nature as a basis for green buildings. Routledge.

Lourenci, A; Zuffo, J; Gualberto, L., (2004). Incipient Emergy Expresses the Self-Organisation Generative Activity of Man-Made Ecomimetic Systems. IV Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies. Campinas, Brazil.

Maglic, M., (2012). Biommiciry: Using nature as a model for design. Massachusetts: Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

McDonough, W; Braungart, M., (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. MacMillan.

McHarg, A., (2010). Property and the law in energy and natural resources. Oxford University Press, Garden City, N.Y..

Mlecnik, E; Schuetze, T; Jansen, S; De Vries, G; Visscher, H; Van Hal, A., (2012). End-user experiences in nearly zero-energy houses. Energy Build, 49: 471-478 (8 pages).

Paevere, P; Brown, S; Leaman, A; Luther, M; Adams, R., (2008). Indoor environment quality and occupant productivity in the CH2 building. SB08: Proc.2008.Int.Sci.Committee World Sustainable Build.Conf (pp. 222-229). [ASN Events] (8 pages).

Reed, B., (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’to regeneration. Build. Res. Inform., 35(6): 674-680 (6 pages).

Rukmane-Poča, I; Krastiņš, J., (2011). Contemporary urban space in the context of formal currents of architecture. Archit. Urban Plann, 5: 58-65 (8 pages).

Singh, A.; Syal, M.; Grady, S.C.; Korkmaz, S., (2010). Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am. J. Public Health, 100(9):1665-1668 (4 pages).

Tan, S.F., (2007). CH2 6 stars, but how does it work. Archit. Aust., 96(1): 101-104 (4 pages).

Van der Ryn, S.; Pena, R., (2002). 10 Ecologic analogues and architecture. Construction Ecology: Nature as the basis for green buildings, In C.J., Kibert; J., Sendzimir; G.B., Guy (eds.), pp. 231–247, Spon Press, London.

Vincent, J. F.; Bogatyreva, O. A.; Bogatyrev, N. R.; Bowyer, A.; Pahl, A.K., (2006). Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J. Royal Soc. Interface, 3(9): 471-482 (12 pages).

Wahl, D. C.; Baxter, S., (2008). The designer's role in facilitating sustainable solutions. Des. Issues, 24(2): 72-83 (12 pages).

Zandieh, M.; Nikkhah, A., (2015). Architecture of buildings using renewable energies in harmony with sustainable development. J. UMP. Soc. Sci. Technol. Manage. 3(2): 27-33 (7 pages)

Zari, M.P., (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability. Auckland, New Zealand.

Zari, M.P., (2010). Biomimetic design for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Archit. Sci. Rev., 53(2): 172-183 (12 pages).

Zari, M.P., (2012). Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Build. Res. Inform., 40(1): 54-64 (11 pages).

Zari, M.P., (2015a). Ecosystem processes for biomimetic architectural and urban design. Architect. Sci. Rev., 58(2): 106-119 (4 pages).

Zari, M.P., (2015b). Can bio mimicry be a useful tool for design for climate change adaptation and mitigation?. In Biotechnologies and biomimetic for civil engineering (pp. 81-113). Springer international Publishing.

Zari, M.P.; Storey, J.B., (2007). An ecosystem based biomimetic theory for a regenerative built environment. In Sustainable Building Conference (Vol. 7).

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Ecosystem Biomimicry: A way to achieve thermal comfort in architecture

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 1, Issue 4
October 2016
Pages 267-278

Ecosystem Biomimicry: A way to achieve thermal comfort in architecture

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 1, Issue 4October 2016Pages 267-278

Volume 1, Issue 4
October 2016
Pages 267-278