Governance, ease of living, and citizens’ perception: Components for quality-of-life assessment in mid-sized smart cities

Dhenge, V.; Nimbarte, G.

doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.02.04

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

V. Dhenge ¹
G. Nimbarte ²

¹ Department of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur, India

² Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India

https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.02.04

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Smart cities are technology-driven urban agglomerations. Sustainability, competitiveness, and quality of life are the three cardinal principles for smart cities. The available studies specific to smart cities are related to smart technologies, innovations, smart infrastructure, etc., and limited studies are conducted from citizens’ perspectives. The present study aims to assess the impact of governance, general well-being, also called ease of living of citizens, and citizens’ perception of smart cities on their quality of life in mid-sized smart cities of India. The innovation and novelty of present study is that it attempts to fill the research gap in studies on smart cities by adopting the citizen-centric approach rather than infrastructure and technology-centric approach in developing countries.
METHODOLOGY: Three Indian mid-sized smart cities, Pune, Nagpur, and Indore were identified for the study. For the purpose of this study, a few hypotheses were developed and a structured questionnaire was prepared from the literature review. The data was collected from Pune, Nagpur, and Indore smart cities and it was analyzed by performing factorial analysis and Structural Equation Modelling using appropriate statistical package software.
FINDINGS: The findings from the statistical analysis validated the hypotheses. The results of the study indicate a strong positive impact of citizens’ perception of smart cities on quality of life (Standardized Estimates = 0.66) while governance (Standardized Estimates = 0.11) and ease of living (SE=0.46) presented low to medium impact relationship with citizens’ quality of life.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study concludes that citizens’ perception has highest influence on their quality of life. Considering these findings in the context of mid-sized smart cities, this study significantly contributes in existing research on tools and indicators of quality-of-life assessment in urban centers specifically in developing countries. This research article attempts to provide a substantial theoretical and practical contribution to urban studies.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Main Subjects

Urban and municipalities management

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center: Tehran Municipality

References

Abid Aown, N.H.; Alkinani, A.S.; Salman, A.S., (2018). Good governance of service quality through the adoption of sustainable energy the study of A1- Karkh historic center of in Baghdad city, in: 2018 2nd International Conference for Engineering, Technology and Sciences of Al-Kitab (ICETS). IEEE, 16-21 (6 pages).

Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M., (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. J. Urban Technol., 22: 3-21 (19 pages).

Alyami, M.; de Albuquerque, J.; Krägeloh, C.; Alyami, H.; Henning, M.;,(2021). Effects of Fear of COVID-19 on Mental Well-Being and Quality of Life among Saudi Adults: A Path Analysis. Saudi J. Med Med. Sci., 9: 24 (7 pages).

Banerjee, F.; (2011). City’s population rises to 23,98,165. The Times of India.

Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Orús, C.; (2016). City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. Cities 50: 75-81 (7 pages).

Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J., (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 31: 183–212 (20 pages).

Bolívar, M.P.R.; Muñoz, L.A., (2019). E-participation in smart cities: technologies and models of governance for citizen engagement.

Bovaird, T.; Löffler, E., (2003). Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 69: 313-328 (16 pages).

Brown, S.P.; Chin, W.W., (2004). Satisfying and Retaining Customers through Independent Service Representatives. Decis. Sci. 35: 527-550 (24 pages).

Capdevila, I.; Zarlenga, M.I., (2015). Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. J. Strategy Manage. 8: 266-282 (17 pages).

Caragliu, A.; Del Bo. C.; Nijkamp, P., (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. J. of Urban Technology 18: 65-82 (18 pages).

Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G.; Garcia-Perez, A.; Moreno-Cegarra, J.L., (2014). Technology knowledge and governance: Empowering citizen engagement and participation. Gov. Inf. Q. 31: 660-668 (9 pages).

Chatterjee, S.; Kar, A.K., (2018). Effects of successful adoption of information technology enabled services in proposed smart cities of India: From user experience perspective. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manage. 9: 189–209 (21 pages).

Chettry, V., (2023). A Critical Review of Urban Sprawl Studies. J. Geovis. Spat. Anal., 7(2): p.28.

Chettry, V.; Surawar, M., (2021). Urban Sprawl Assessment in Eight Mid-sized Indian Cities Using RS and GIS. J. Indian Soc. Remote. Sens., 49(11): 2721–2740 (20 pages).

Das, A.K., (2016). Urban Planning in India. Rawat Publications.

Datta, A., (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 5: 3-22 (20 pages).

De Guimarães, J.C.F.; Severo, E.A.; Felix Júnior, L.A.; Da Costa, W.P.L.B.; Salmoria, F.T., (2020). Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. J. Clean Prod. 253: p.119926 (13 pages).

Díaz-Cayeros, A.; Magaloni, B.; Ruiz-Euler, A., (2014). Traditional Governance, Citizen Engagement, and Local Public Goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Dev. 53: 80-93 (14 pages).

DIENER, E.; and SUH, E., (1997). MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE: ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND SUBJECTIVE INDICATORS. Soc. Indic. Res., 40(1/2): 189–216 (28 pages).

Evans, G., (2009). Creative Cities, Creative Spaces and Urban Policy. Urban Stud 46: 1003-1040 (38 pages).

Field, A., (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications Ltd., London.

Gendel-Guterman, H.; Billig, M., (2021). Increasing citizen satisfaction with municipal services: the function of intangible factors. Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark. 18: 171-186 (16 pages).

Georgiadis, A.; Christodoulou, P.; Zinonos, Z., (2021). Citizens’ Perception of Smart Cities: A Case Study. Appl. Sci. 11: 2517 (20 pages).

Giannico, V.; Spano, G.; Elia, M.; D’Este, M.; Sanesi, G.; Lafortezza, R., (2021). Green spaces, quality of life, and citizen perception in European cities. Environ. Res. 196: p.110922.

Giffinger, R.; Gudrun, H., (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? Archit. City Environ. 4: 7-26 (20 pages).

Goldman, T.; Gorham, R., (2006). Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions. Technol. Soc. 28: 261-273 (13 pages).

Goretzko, D.; Siemund, K.; Sterner, P., (2023). Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. p.00131644231163813.

Gorla, N.; Somers, T.M.; Wong, B., (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 19: 207–228 (22 pages).

Gupta, K.; Hall, R.P., (2017). The Indian Perspective of Smart Cities (6 pages).

Hair, J.; Celsi, M.; Money, A.; Samouel, P.; Page, M., (2019). Essentials of Business Research Methods, Third. ed. Routledge, New York and London.

Hanna, M.; Strober, L.B., (2020). Anxiety and depression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Antecedents, consequences, and differential impact on well-being and quality of life. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 44: p.102261.

Harrison, T.M.; Guerrero, S.; Burke, G.B.; Cook, M.; Cresswell, A.; Helbig, N.; Hrdinova, J.; Pardo, T., (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf. Polity 17: 83-97 (15 pages).

Honnakatti, Dr.V., (2020). Living With Ease: A Psychological View. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Indore Municipal Corporation, 2023. Indore Municipal Corporation [WWW Document]. Indore Municipal Corporation, Madhya Pradesh State. (accessed 10.16.23).

Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Raman, K.R., (2019). Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 47: 88-100 (13 pages).

Ju, J.; Liu, L.; Feng, Y., (2019). Public and private value in citizen participation in E-governance: Evidence from a government-sponsored green commuting platform. Gov. Inf. Q 36: p.101400.

Kamyab, H.; Klemeš, J.J.; Van Fan Y.; Lee, C.T., (2020). Transition to Sustainable Energy System for Smart Cities and Industries. Energy, 207: p.118104.

Kelly, J.M.; Swindell, D., (2002). SERVICE QUALITY VARIATION ACROSS URBAN SPACE: First Steps Toward a Model of Citizen Satisfaction. J. Urban Aff. 24: 271-288 (18 pages).

Kelarestaghi, K.B.; Ermagun, A.; Heaslip, K.P., (2019). Cycling Usage and Frequency Determinants in College Campuses. Cities, 90: 216-228 (13 pages).

Kock, N., (2023). Contributing to the Success of PLS in SEM: An Action Research Perspective. Commune. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 52: 730-734 (5 pages).

Kronsell, A.; Mukhtar-Landgren, D., (2018). Experimental governance: the role of municipalities in urban living labs. Eur. Plan. Stud. 26: 988-1007 (20 pages).

Kuo, T.; Chen, C.T.; Cheng, W.J., (2018). Service quality evaluation: moderating influences of first-time and revisiting customers. Total. Qual. Manage. Bus. 29: 429-440 (12 pages).

Lam, B.; Chen, Y.P.; Whittle, J.; Binner, J.; Lawlor-Wright, T., (2015). Better service design for greater civic engagement. Des. J. 18: 31–55 (25 pages).

Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S.-H., (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 80: 286-306 (21 pages).

Li, W.; Feng, T.; Timmermans, H.J.P.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M.; Li, B., (2020). Analysis of citizens’ motivation and participation intention in urban planning. Cities 106: p.102921.

Lynn, L.E.; Heinrich, C.J.; Hill, C.J., (2000). Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 10: 233-262 (30 pages).

Macke, J.; Casagrande, R.M.; Sarate, J.A.R.; Silva, K.A., (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. J. Clean. Prod. 182: 717-726 (10 pages).

March, J.G.; Olsen, J.P., (2010). Rediscovering institutions. Simon and Schuster, New York.

Meijer, A.; Bolívar, M.P.R., (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 82: 392–408 (17 pages).

MoHUA, 2021. Smart City Mission Transform-Nation [WWW Document].

MoHUA, 2020. Ease of Living Index 2019 Assessment Framework. New Delhi.

Monfaredzadeh, T.; Berardi, U., (2015). Beneath the smart city: dichotomy between sustainability and competitiveness. Int. J. Sustain. Build. 6: 140-156 (17 pages).

Nielsen, S.S.; Skou, S.T.; Larsen, A.E.; Søndergaard, J.; Christensen, J.R., (2022). Associations of health-related quality of life with sociodemographic characteristics, health, pain, and lifestyle factors, and motivation for changing lifestyle in adults living with chronic pain: a cross-sectional exploratory study. Scand. J. Pain 22: 142-153 (12 pages).

Odendaal, N., (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 27: 585-607 (23 pages).

Papachristou, I.A.; Rosas-Casals, M., (2019). Cities and quality of life. Quantitative modeling of the emergence of the happiness field in urban studies. Cities 88: 191-208 (18 pages).

Peach, N.D.; Petach, L.A., (2016). Development and Quality of Life in Cities. Econ. Dev. Q. 30: 32–45 (14 pages).

Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P., (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88: p.879.

Portney, K.E.; Berry, J.M., (2010). Participation and the Pursuit of Sustainability in U.S. Cities. Urban Aff. Rev. 46: 119-139 (21 pages).

Praharaj, S.; Han, H., (2019). Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India. City Cult. Soc. 18: p.100289.

Praharaj, S.; Han, J.H.; Hawken, S., (2017). Innovative Civic Engagement and Digital Urban Infrastructure: Lessons from 100 Smart Cities Mission in India, in: Procedia Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, 1423-1432 (10 pages).

Prasad, D.; Alizadeh, T., (2020). What Makes Indian Cities Smart? A Policy Analysis of Smart Cities Mission. Telemat. Inform. 55: p.101466.

Pune Municipal Corporation, (2021). Pune Towards Smart City Vol II. Pune.

Ramachandra, T.V.; and Bharath H. Aithal., (2013) “Urbanisation and Sprawl in the Tier II City: Metrics, Dynamics and Modelling Using Spatio-Temporal Data.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 3(2): 65-74 (10 pages).

Rolland, S.; Freeman, I., (2010). A new measure of e‐service quality in France. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. 38: 497-517 (21 pages).

Sadashivam, T.; Tabassu, S., (2016). Trends Of Urbanization In India: Issues And Challenges In The 21st Century. Int. j. inf. res. rev., 3(5): 2375-2384 (10 pages).

Sharifi, A., (2020). A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustain Cities Soc 53: p.101936 (37 pages).

Sharifi, A., (2019). A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. J Clean Prod 233: 1269-1283 (15 pages).

Shoshani, A.; Steinmetz, S.; Kanat-Maymon, Y., (2016). Effects of the Maytiv positive psychology school program on early adolescents’ well-being, engagement, and achievement. J. Sch. Psychol. 57: 73-92 (20 pages).

Smith, R.M.; Pathak, P., (2018). Urban Sustainability in India: Green Buildings, AMRUT Yojana, and Smart Cities, in: Metropolitan Governance in Asia and the Pacific Rim. Springer Singapore, Singapore, p.163-190 (28 pages).

Smith, R.M.; Pathak, P.A.; Agrawal, G., (2019). India’s “smart” cities mission: A preliminary examination into India’s newest urban development policy. J. Urban Aff. 41: 518-534 (17 pages).

Sofyani, H.; Riyadh, H.A.; Fahlevi, H., (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Bus. Manage. 7: p.1735690.

Stefansson, K.K.; Gestsdottir, S.; Birgisdottir, F.; Lerner, R.M., (2018). School engagement and intentional self‐regulation: A reciprocal relation in adolescence. J. Adolesc. 64: 23-33 (11 pages).

Stipak, B., (1979). Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services: Potential Misuse as a Performance Indicator. Source: Public Adm. Rev. 39: 46-52 (7 pages).

Suhr, D., (2006). The Basics of Structural Equation Modeling. CA.

United Nations, (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision.

Vázquez, J.L.; Lanero, A.; Gutiérrez, P.; Sahelices, C., (2018). The Contribution of Smart Cities to Quality of Life from the View of Citizens. 55-66 (10 pages).

Vitman Schorr, A.; Khalaila, R., (2018). Aging in place and quality of life among the elderly in Europe: A moderated mediation model. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 77: 196-204 (9 pages).

WCED - World Commission on Environment and Development; 1987. Report of The World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York.

Weston, R.; Gore, P.A., (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Couns. Psychol., 34(5): 719-751 (33 pages).

Weziak-Białowolska, D., (2016). Quality of life in cities - Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities 58: 87-96 (10 pages).

Wittmayer, J.M.; Avelino, F.; van Steenbergen, F.; Loorbach, D., (2017). Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 24: 45-56 (12 pages).

Yadav, G.; Mangla, S.K.; Luthra, S.; Rai, D.P., (2019). Developing a sustainable smart city framework for developing economies: An Indian context. Sustain. Cities. Soc. 47: p.101462.

Zeithaml, V.; Parasuraman, A.; Berry, L.; (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. Simon and Schuster.

Zenker, S.; Rütter, N., (2014). Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior. Cities 38: 11-17 (7 pages).

Zhu, W.; Yan, R.; Song, Y., (2022). Analysing the impact of smart city service quality on citizen engagement in a public emergency. Cities 120: p.103439.

Žlender, V.; Gemin, S., (2020). Testing urban dwellers’ sense of place towards leisure and recreational peri-urban green open spaces in two European cities. Cities 98: p.102579.

LETTERS TO EDITOR

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management (IJHCUM) welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in IJHCUM should be sent to the editorial office of IJHCUM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.

[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.

[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.

[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.

[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.

[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.

[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management

Governance, ease of living, and citizens’ perception: Components for quality-of-life assessment in mid-sized smart cities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
April 2024
Pages 235-254

Governance, ease of living, and citizens’ perception: Components for quality-of-life assessment in mid-sized smart cities

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34April 2024Pages 235-254

Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
April 2024
Pages 235-254